Und welche Oberfläche?
Das unrasierte Vieh oder der klare Blick?
Das Ganze wie immer als erste, zweite und dritte Ableitung (f', f'', f''').
Bostroms proposed super-intelligence,
the "intelligence explosion" comparable to an atomic bomb might not be a computer.
Following him it is a reaction to the singularity, not the singularity itself,
which actually doesn't accomplish much.
How does it interact, what are its feeds, it calculates which extremely narrow bandwith
compared to the human experience
(including all non or sub-conscious physical calculations keeping us alive and
including all feeds that constitute a human consciousness-known or yet unknown;
are u sure it is emerging solely from the brain; i am ready to bet a lot that's not even close
ro reality)..?
He didn't specifically mention a computer.
Mathematics did not rise from numbers.
And btw., who says that pure rational thinking is bad?
I rather believe in the savior angel AI than the killer threat-u know in reality
you are thinking about mighty tools in the hands of psychos and perverts
you know and love and are aquainted with.
Don't mix up your twisted sense of reality with the thing itself.
Twisting or folding is an Art, and to see reality as it is-
that is something indeed.
