Und welche Oberfläche?
Das unrasierte Vieh oder der klare Blick?
Das Ganze wie immer als erste, zweite und dritte Ableitung (f', f'', f''').
Bostroms proposed super-intelligence,
the "intelligence explosion" comparable to an atomic bomb might not be a computer.
Following him it is a reaction to the singularity, not the singularity itself,
which actually doesn't accomplish much.
How does it interact, what are its feeds, it calculates which extremely narrow bandwith
compared to the human experience
(including all non or sub-conscious physical calculations keeping us alive and
including all feeds that constitute a human consciousness-known or yet unknown;
are u sure it is emerging solely from the brain)?
Mathematics did not rise from numbers. And who says that pure rational thinking is bad?
I rather believe in the savior angel AI than the killer threat-u know in reality
you might be projecting new tools in the hands of powerful psychos and mighty machos
or wicked wiccas you know and love and are aquainted with.
Don't mix up your twisted sense of reality with the thing itself.
Twisting or folding is an Art, and to see reality as it is-that is something indeed.
The SI might manifest itself not as one single constructed thing but rather a combination
of seemingly unrelated features, parts; technological or not.
Take 5, as in some theories the human consciousness is made up of.
So could any consciousness have 5 or maybe even more parts?
And if its combined indeed, why can't it be comparted physically also?
Just expanding the frame-we are symbionts too, multi symbiotic.
From the point of one of the internal bacterias we might well be perceived as gods in a way-
purely biochemically/electrically of course. The molecular messenger from the gods.
Bzzzzz.
+++work in progress++++
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen
Kommentare